Orchestration ≠ durability
Reasoning decides what should happen next. A durable workflow layer owns restart, retry, timers, long waits, and recovery when a business process must survive infrastructure failure.
LEGENYX separates task contracts, orchestration, durable workflows, memory, model routing, tools, observability, validation, and release authority so the system can evolve without making one model or vendor the control plane.
The center coordinates work, but each surrounding concern keeps its own contract and authority. Animated paths show information flow; they do not imply every request uses every subsystem.
The most important boundaries are the ones that prevent a convenient abstraction from quietly becoming authority.
Reasoning decides what should happen next. A durable workflow layer owns restart, retry, timers, long waits, and recovery when a business process must survive infrastructure failure.
Typed capabilities and tool access stay separate from cross-agent task delegation. Discovery never becomes authorization by itself.
A provider gateway normalizes transport. LEGENYX policy decides eligibility, privacy, quality floors, cost ceilings, promotion state, and which qualified runtime may execute.
A stronger model does not receive broader permissions. Consequential actions remain bounded by deterministic policy, server-side authorization, validation, and approval.
Canonical memory keeps ownership, provenance, trust state, correction, and retention in application-controlled records. Vector indexes remain retrieval mechanisms.
Trace relationships preserve request, task, run, model, tool, approval, test, and outcome evidence while keeping secrets and unnecessary sensitive payloads out of telemetry.
Normalizes user, service, and event input while preserving identity and project context.
Turns intent into bounded task contracts, policy decisions, and qualified worker selection.
Owns retry, recovery, waiting, scheduling, and business-process continuity outside model memory.
Stores canonical state, ownership, provenance, retrieval indexes, and retention outside the model.
Routes compatible tasks to qualified local, cloud, or API models through provider-neutral interfaces.
Exposes typed capabilities through least-privilege boundaries with explicit server-side authorization.
Correlates source, task, run, model, tool, approval, validation, cost, and outcome evidence.
Keeps approval, production authority, rollback, and high-impact controls outside model confidence.
Models, runtimes, gateways, memory, tools, workflows, and UI stay behind explicit contracts so one change does not own the system.
Compatible models and infrastructure can change without turning one vendor into source or policy authority.
Runtime, quality, security, and release statements are bound to inspectable evidence rather than model assertion.
High-impact actions have explicit escalation, approval, and override paths with enough context for a reviewer to act.
Tool access, data access, credentials, and production permissions are narrowed to the task and enforced outside the model.
Queues, distributed compute, dedicated vector systems, and larger model fleets are introduced when workload measurements require them.
Discovery can cover application state, model eligibility, workflows, data ownership, tool authority, infrastructure, observability, approval paths, validation, release, and recovery.